This post is in response to an invite from my friend Julie Clawson to be part of a synchroblog with many others that attempts to answer, “What is emerging in the church?”

I think the church is starting to realize it’s okay to embody what is known as swarm theory, or SI (swarm intelligence). We are beginning to see the value of “all” instead of “me.” We are beginning to see that there is a greater, undefinable, all-encompassing, all-accepting power guiding us (even if none of us know where we’re going).
The biggest objection to the idea that intentionally submitting oneself to a collective (sub)consciousness is that some think this devalues humanity. They may think this flies in the face of the entire Christian thesis that God gave us each free will. If I may call it spiritual swarm theory, I would say flatly that it does not at all erase free will; it enhances it.
What is emerging in the church is a deep listening that doesn’t listen selectively according to a person’s appearance, preferences, or even beliefs. It listens to the person. It listens to that still, small voice inside that person. That voice that speaks to us all from within us all. And that’s what moves us.
_____
Case in Point
Someone who calls himself an “agnostic pentecostal” has been invited to share his thoughts about what they think is emerging in the church. Yes, I am a middle-class, white, straight male, which is definitely not a minority in terms of church leadership. But I have no Ph.D; I am no pastor; I have chosen not to be ordained; I don’t have a book published or a TV program or an album or even a popular blog. Those facts, combined with the fact that I’m just barely a Christian at all according to traditional definitions, would have eliminated me from having a real, valued leadership role in the church. In fact, for some churches, the fact that I come from a pentecostal-type background might even scare some away from me.
So to have been invited to share my voice illustrates my point about what good I think is happening in the church: The entire concept of “leadership” is being redefined, albeit slowly. And this is creating a movement of listening. A movement that’s trying hard to see all stories as equally valuable. A movement that sees importance in being led by the rejected as much as (or more than) the selected.
There is a difference between inviting the rejected into your circle and letting them lead it. As another example, the church of the past, as I call it, would welcome a gay person into their church as long as that person would join a group or class designed to straighten them out. The statement I heard in several sermons was, “God loves you just the way you are — but too much to let you stay that way.” But I am seeing proof that churches are taking seriously the notion that keeps it simple with just, “God loves you just the way you are. That’s it. Nothing else to add. No classes to take before you’re really welcome. You are welcome. Now please tell us your story so we can learn from you.” This is happening in my faith community.
And it’s not just a liberal thing…Tolerance is not just for universalists anymore. It’s not just tolerance either; it’s true acceptance. I think people are starting to see that they can keep their conservative beliefs, without watering them down, share those beliefs, and also find value in the spirituality of others. Because we’re all in the same swarm.
In my case, I feel there’s no need for compromise in being simultaneously agnostic and pentecostal. I can pray in tongues if I want, even if I doubt, for example, that Jesus was the product of a literal virgin birth. And the best part is that I feel supported by (some of) my Christian friends…They’re not only okay with that, but they don’t try to change my view, and they listen intently to see exactly what the full story might be, so they can learn and exchange perspectives.
They see me as a valuable part of a grander story, and I see them the same. We want to learn from each other. Because we’ve started to listen to a still, small voice that tells us that none of us has the whole story, but all of us are an integral to it.
_____
By the Way
Some may see this all as a sign that pluralism, extreme liberalism, and even communism are seeping into the church. I choose to see this as a sign that people are just starting to realize that things cannot seep into or out of the church, because we are all the Church. We are all in this together. And “We” has no walls. Some may see this as a sign that incorrect beliefs are causing God’s presence to leave certain churches. To that I say people are starting to remember that God is omnipresent. He’s always with us. Nothing can separate us from his love. Similarly, some may say that God being present in only certain churches is due to the fact that, according to scripture, “God inhabits the praises of his people,” and that only some are praising him correctly, and only those who do so correctly can truly be called “his people.” I choose to believe that there is no wrong way to praise God, and that all people are God’s people.
_____
Check out these other synchroblog posts on this topic:
Sharon Brown writes about using labels as an excuse. * Pam Hogeweide compares the emerging church movement to a game of ping pong. * Sarah-Ji comments that the emerging questions people are asking are far bigger than any defined movement. * Peter Walker reflects on how the emerging church conversation helped him recognize his power and privlege as a white male. * Dave Huth posts a on new ways to talk about religion. * Kathy Escobar finds hope in seeing a spirit of love in action emerging in the church. * Nadia Bolz-Weber reflects on the the beautiful things she sees emerging in her church community. * Chad Holtz writes on our Our Emerging Jewishness. * MojoJules describes her organic entry into the emerging church and reflects on moving forward with a new public face. * Danielle Shoyer reflects on what is emerging in the church. * Brian Merritt offers his pros and cons of the emerging church. * Julie Clawson is grateful for emerging globalized Christianity. * Susan Philips points out that emergence happens as G-d redeems our shattered realities. * Mike Clawson reflects on the non-western voices that brought him to the emerging conversation. * Jake Bouma suggest that what is emerging is a collapse into simplicity. * Liz Dyer believes a chastened epistemology is a valuable characteristic emerging out of the church today. * Rachel Held Evans writes on what is changing in the church. * Tia Lynn Lecorchick describes the emerging movement as a wood between worlds (from The Magician’s Nephew). * Amy Moffitt shares her journey towards a theology of humility. * Travis Mamone comments on the need for the emerging church to rely on the word of God. * Sa Say reflects on the the prick of doubt. * David Henson lists what he sees as what is emerging in the church. * Angela Harms writes in in defense of emergent. * Wendy Gritter asks how we can listening to the voices from the margins. * Bruce Epperly comments on the largeness of spirit of emerging spirituality. * Linda Jamentz reflects on listening to the voices from the margins in church. * Lisa Bain Carlton hopes that our emerging conversation can respond humbly to our moment in time. * Christine Sine asks how far are we willing to be transformed.
Even when we thought we were in control of things like “the church membership roles,” we knew (or at least said) “the true church is invisible.” The difference between traditional thinking and what Dave is sharing is that we still thought we could tell who was in and who was out, no-matter what we said. I remember some years ago when I first realized that in Jesus’ parable of the wheat and the tares, it is the angels who remove the weeds at the end of the age. The workers ask if they should do it, but are told no. Explicitly, they are told they will remove some of the wheat if they try to weed themselves. Amen. It is just not our job, not now, not later. God knows the hearts. The sheep hear their shepherd’s voice. Even in I John, where some have left the church (apparently, at Ephesus) it is the word of truth which has caused them to leave, not some action of the apostle or elders. It is not our job. The Lord defends the borders because the Lord knows where the borders are. We are to love and do and tell the truth. Good stuff, Dave!
Thanks all for your comments. Trace, you said it beautifully: “…We still thought we could tell who was in and who was out, no-matter what we said.”
Every church has it s foundational, unspoken assumptions and presuppositions. We may have said we accept everyone, but our ideas of the meaning of acceptance were limited by our (sometimes unconscious, sometimes very conscious) the programming we inherited.
I think/hope that some of that fundamental, foundational coding/programming is starting to change, at the most basic level. Some of it may be generational but not all. I have hope that it is divinely influenced.
And to any who may argue that it’s a liberal-versus-conservative thing, I disagree. Because both groups are experience fundamental shifts. Both liberals and conservatives are softening their borders. Some in those groups are becoming more polarized, yes, but the foundational elements are softening. That gives me hope.
Thanks, Dave
I teach in the Federal Prison in Rochester, MN one day a week. Twice a year the Charis ministry puts on a three-day weekend for anyone who will come to it. People vote with their feet each day. Talk about instant feedback! There are often over eighty men at those events.
One time I was called out of the community room to do a one-on-one counselling (as a weekend spiritual director). A guy sat across from me, giving me reason after reason why he should not be accepted by God. He is crazy. He is a criminal. He is gay. He kept on finding reasons why God should not love him. The Spirit of God fell on me with overwhelming power as I declared over and over that he is a child of God, that God loves him with an overwhelming, utter and total love. At last, he sat quietly and looked at me. “You really mean that?” I told him I was more cetain of what I was saying than I was of my own name.
It was an amazing, almost magic moment. I never saw him again after that weekend but continue to pray that he will hold the truth we shared in his heart. We really do forget who is the dad and who are the kids.
Thanks for your ministry and for your part in Julie’s synchroblog. It was fantastic and more than this Bible teacher could take in all at once.
It has also made me think some more about what I hope is emerging and what I see. Most of us, me included, are really too close to the ground to see. Another reason an event like this synchroblog is a real value. For years I felt hopeless. Brian McClaren, N. T. Wright and Phyllis Tickle have given me some hope.
Blessings!
[...] reflects on moving forward with a new public face. Dave Brown comments on the emerging church and swarm theory. Danielle Shroyer reflects on what is emerging in the church. Brian Merritt offers his pros and [...]
[...] Dave Brown comments on the emerging church and swarm theory. [...]
[...] Dave Brown comments on the emerging church and swarm theory. [...]
[...] reflects on moving forward with a new public face. Dave Brown comments on the emerging church and swarm theory. Danielle Shoyer reflects on what is emerging in the church. Brian Merritt offers his pros and [...]
[...] reflects on moving forward with a new public face. Dave Brown comments on the emerging church and swarm theory. Danielle Shoyer reflects on what she sees emerging in the church. Brian Merritt offers his pros [...]
Five years ago (or more) the Church of Scotland started a program of listening and building a “Church without Walls” as they called it. I like it!
[...] Dave Brown comments on the emerging church and swarm theory. [...]
amen brother. to accept people as they are and then ask them to share their story so that we can learn from them? not to demand that people change in order to be part of community? to allow people to be in the deepest part of the conversation in ways that transform everybody in it? if that’s what emerging is, and you say it is, and i agree (because i see it all over the place), then i’m in.
[...] reflects on moving forward with a new public face. Dave Brown comments on the emerging church and swarm theory. Danielle Shoyer reflects on the big tent of the emerging church. Brian Merrit offers his pros and [...]